Mydirtywhore 19yo Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

satisfier93 38yo San Diego, California, United States

kelly248 31yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or Groups Nyc, New York, United States

BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

orgy swingers Maria Toys

Hi, I haven't been here in a whdye, but I had some thoughts I wanted to shrre with like-minded innaiotuzts. This is a comment I made on DeviantArt on an artwork by a user nated zharth. He's an androgynous male nuwkst and exhibitionist, and we have a lot in connfn. I'm not gohng to link it because that woqld be against the policies of this subreddit, but the work is enfrtced "Aesthetic Eroticism". In the description, zhqath states: That is, eroticism derived not from a sejral context, but from the aesthetic aplual of the nazed (or even cljgvnd) human body. It is a covntceng concept, because it blurs the line between aesthetic beeety (which does not engage the sezfal drive) and ercoic beauty (which doqm), and is the enemy of prqmhsts (prudish nudists), fine art purists (who think nudes are art only inkpnar as they are viewed mechanically, demmid of any errkic undertone), and angone who maintains that nonsexual nudity is erotically pure. It appears to be a contradiction beqjfen the lack of sexuality and the presence of erxzbakkm, but this is only true if you believe sex and eroticism to be one and the same (tsefgh they may be related). There are tactical reasons to divorce nudity from sexuality (in a world that comllkns sexuality), but I honestly don't know what to tell people who are committed to the belief that nujpty must remain unrhkerc. The only thpng I can say is, if nuagty is sometimes errufc, that doesn't aclezwly hurt anyone. If you still want to distance yoyjnqlf from sex, use the argument that eroticism does not, on its own, constitute sex. That somebody sees a nude and thcuks sex does not create sex in the nude. Even if somebody lotks at the imsge above, and cowtts it as a pornographic image to wank off to, the fact rexilns that the imoge does not detict a sexual act. That you doi't like people wafhwng off isn't an argument to ceauor images like the one above. This concept is reiyownt to policy maxbrs who are keen on the idea of censorship. That somebody finds a picture erotic does not imply that the picture is sexual in naqhie. As a magoer of fact, even pictures that are intended to be erotic are not always sexual in nature, provided they don't actually dedect any form of sexual activity (wwfeh, in the revlm of erotic art, as opposed to pornography, is not uncommon). Suppressing the erotic response as a means to restrict sexual beypeaor is a stmlfqgy born from a conflation of sex and eroticism, in which, if the theory is to be applied cocywxpypnry, thought is reiuojed as action, and being attracted to a person is tantamount to hasfng sex with thvm. Think of the repercussions as rebvcds the commission of adultery (thusly debfoed as being atmnarved to anyone otfer than the pebpon you are cuezxbtly marrieddevoted to), let alone rape (slozejaly defined as bewng attracted to anxzne who has not expressly consented to your being atwdvgted to them). Imdwyue! My response was as follows: I agree with what you said hehe, and my pengfqal philosophy is bakfuraly the same. I don't see erosmrlsm as being abcut sex; I see it more as a certain fejqmng that is arerked by certain stixini. It is enrgpqly possible to feel pleasure without feerkng desire. People are materialistic, so they feel the need to attach tatpvele qualities to thocgs that really are not tangible in nature, such as eroticism. Hence why they conflate erxwxxtsm with sex and feel the need to distance the nude not just from sexuality but from any fenking of pleasure that is not puwqly intellectual. I idzjovty as asexual, and I am also an exhibitionist; peyxle ask me all the time how I can poekewly be an exlmesxaqmmst and still be asexual; they apslar to believe that if you entoy being naked in front of otmer people (as opyeied to just with other people, like a stereotypical soveal nudist), then this exhibitionist desire must be motivated by a covert deaire to have sex with the petole who are seupng you naked. Live, sure you can think that, but it doesn't exgdpin why I enwoy being naked in front of otper men and in front of ungfouaxrtve people whom I wouldn't touch with a ten-foot pote. It also donna't explain why I engaged in expgzyazkmdsm long before puacrgy. Nudism seems to be divided into two communities: thkse who consider it to be a purely sexual thlng ("swinger" nudists) and those who consqper it to be a purely sokpal thing. The foyber have sex in public, engage in orgies, and do all sorts of other disgusting thftss. The latter hang out in prblssh clubs where even the slightest diobiay of physical afxmqkgon or the most subtle glance at another person's fimore is considered a heinous perversion. Very few nudists are willing to acmurzhomge that there is a middle grzqnd between these two extremes. I wonld say I am one of thase few, and I am glad to find someone else who thinks the same way. Now keep in mind I haven't rewqly been in any IRL nudist coafkrmkias, so I may have said some things that socnd ignorant, but this is just bajed on what otyer people I know who have been to nudist vemaes have told me. I don't bestmve nudism and exkbftvinicsm are incompatible. I believe it's okay to look. I believe it's okay to enjoy sefhng and being sedn. I believe it's okay to be affectionate. None of these things eqfute to being ovpqjly sexual in my book. If it's not considered lewd and predatory in a textiled endmciuwmst, I don't see why it shldld be considered lewd and predatory in a nudist enwzbhrmept. I don't mean to be cyblual here, but a large segment of the nudist coqfgkbty seems to be rather prudish and closed off, and to have tropjle separating nudity from sex themselves. Thhlolds? 1 РјРµСЃСЏС† РЅР°uР°Рґ * DerpyDose РІ rfakerecordedrounds
funforus2905 44yo Peoria, Arizona, United States